(no subject)
Dec. 29th, 2004 01:14 amAs the death toll in Asia spirals, and as people start trying to make sense of that number by tring to think of it as a city of comparable size, I'm reminded of one of the speeches made at one of New York's 9/11 memorials in 2001.
A Rabbi noted that the important number wasn't if 6,000 people died or 5,000 people died or 3,000 people died.
The important number is 1.
3,000 people didn't die, 1 person died 3,000 times.
For myself, it doesn't lessen the horror -- and it's not intended to. I can't and I wouldn't if I could. But it does put what happened into very immediate and real terms for me.
A Rabbi noted that the important number wasn't if 6,000 people died or 5,000 people died or 3,000 people died.
The important number is 1.
3,000 people didn't die, 1 person died 3,000 times.
For myself, it doesn't lessen the horror -- and it's not intended to. I can't and I wouldn't if I could. But it does put what happened into very immediate and real terms for me.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-29 07:08 am (UTC)>3,000 people didn't die, 1 person died 3,000 times.
That makes it even more mind-boggling to me for both Asia and 9/11.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-29 10:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-29 10:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-29 10:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-30 05:53 am (UTC)Well Said
Date: 2004-12-30 05:59 am (UTC)Re: Well Said
Date: 2004-12-30 06:04 am (UTC)